Defending theft and fraud charges in the military typically requires understanding and addressing two broad components of the offense. First, the forensic evidence must show that a crime really has been committed. Personnel of any rank who mishandle or misplace property they are in charge of may be guilty of poor judgment, but not necessarily guilty of intent to commit theft or fraud. Failure in job performance does not make the service member a thief.
A mistake doesn't make you a thief
Making a mistake on the job and losing track of military resources does not mean you are guilty of theft or fraud. The military must prove criminal intent in order to file a criminal charge or seek a harsh punishment. Understanding the military accounting process is often key to an effective legal defense.
The second component is a matter of confessing to the offense. Because of the military command structure and the unique nature of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), service members often find it expedient to confess to a theft or fraud charge, without being informed of their rights, or knowing how the confession will impact their record. Confessing to a theft or fraud charge does not necessarily mean the offense deserves the harsh punishment that the UCMJ calls for.
Experienced Fraud Charges Defense Attorney · Call toll free 800-391-7308
I am civilian military criminal defense lawyer Charles Swift, and I am ready to travel anywhere in the world to protect the rights of U.S. service members facing a court-martial, a military performance offense, or possible administrative separation for misconduct. No matter how far along in the UCMJ process you are — from initial investigation through appeals — I can help you protect your rights.
As a former JAG defense lawyer, I learned that the UCMJ system does not give service members charged with theft or fraud a fair opportunity for vigorous, unbiased legal representation. Many JAG defense counsel are excellent, however most are limited by the fact that they are not only junior lawyers, they are also junior officer with a very limited understanding of military regulations, supply, and operating procedures. To defend a fraud case, whether it is misappropriation of funds or theft of government property, it takes a complete understanding of military standard operating procedures and regulations. As retired military officer with 20 years experience, including seven as a line officer in the United States Navy, I have the experience and understanding necessary to defend fraud charges in the military. As a service member, you have the right to retain civilian counsel and it is your best opportunity to fully protect your future.
Free Initial Consultation · I Represent U.S. Military Personnel Around the World
From offices in Seattle, the firm represents clients in civilian criminal matters and military family law matters throughout Washington State. Mr. Swift represents clients in military law matters at U.S. bases around the world. Contact the law firm of Swift & McDonald, P.S., to arrange a free initial consultation with an experienced military theft offenses attorney today.
